Signed, "Sealed", Delivered!
 
October 2011
By Nichole Doub, MAC Lab Head Conservator
 
 All consumers  want assurances as to the quality of products and may prefer one manufacturer  over another.  This is as true  historically as it is today.  Cloth seals  or bale seals are one method of assurance.   These lead seals were attached to the outside corner on a bolt of cloth  and were often impressed with a variety of marks including dates, symbols and  hand scratchings.  Historically, these  seals indicated that the product being traded had undergone some form of  inspection both for quality control and taxation purposes (Egan; 1994, 1-3).  Cloth seals came into use in the early 1300s  in England after King Edward I ordered the official supervision of manufactured  woolen cloth (Endrei and Egan 1982,64).   This practice, called alnage, was abandoned by the British government in  1724 (Luckenbach and Cox; 2003, 17).  Knowing  this, cloth seals can be useful to archaeologists both as a dating tool and for  identifying trade sources.
 All consumers  want assurances as to the quality of products and may prefer one manufacturer  over another.  This is as true  historically as it is today.  Cloth seals  or bale seals are one method of assurance.   These lead seals were attached to the outside corner on a bolt of cloth  and were often impressed with a variety of marks including dates, symbols and  hand scratchings.  Historically, these  seals indicated that the product being traded had undergone some form of  inspection both for quality control and taxation purposes (Egan; 1994, 1-3).  Cloth seals came into use in the early 1300s  in England after King Edward I ordered the official supervision of manufactured  woolen cloth (Endrei and Egan 1982,64).   This practice, called alnage, was abandoned by the British government in  1724 (Luckenbach and Cox; 2003, 17).  Knowing  this, cloth seals can be useful to archaeologists both as a dating tool and for  identifying trade sources.
The most  common type of commercial cloth seal is the riveted form, whereby the seal was  attached by folding two lead disks, connected by a thin strip, around either  side of a corner of cloth so that the rivet could be pushed through  the cloth  and the corresponding hole in the other disk (Figure 1).  The seal was then hammered with one die, or  between two dies, to close it in place and to register the necessary  information on its surface (Egan; 1994, 4).   The symbols on the seals can include information about the date and  region of production/inspection as well as a wide range of makers’ marks,  personal initials and notes for length, width and weight.  Symbols indicating alnage include the crown,  coats of arms, griffins or lions rampart, heads of royalty, etc. (Luckenbach and  Cox; 2003, 18).
the cloth  and the corresponding hole in the other disk (Figure 1).  The seal was then hammered with one die, or  between two dies, to close it in place and to register the necessary  information on its surface (Egan; 1994, 4).   The symbols on the seals can include information about the date and  region of production/inspection as well as a wide range of makers’ marks,  personal initials and notes for length, width and weight.  Symbols indicating alnage include the crown,  coats of arms, griffins or lions rampart, heads of royalty, etc. (Luckenbach and  Cox; 2003, 18).
A number of lead  cloth seals were recovered from the Angelica Knoll site (c. 1677-1735)  excavation in Calvert County, MD.   Of  the Angelica Knoll cloth seals, two show clear striking/impression marks.  The seal in Figure 3 has a clear impression  of an “I” and “S”.  It is unusual that the impression has been  made on the second disk rather than the blank first disk.  The alnage seal in Figure 4 shows the head of  a monarch on the inner disk, which often bears governmental symbols, while the outer  disk is impressed with local information, in this case a scratched "N".
 
 
Objects like these lead cloth seals can provide valuable information to archaeologists.  However, lead does not always survive well in  the archaeological record.  When lead  deteriorates, unlike iron or copper, its original surface is not retained in  the corrosion products.  This means that  no amount of cleaning can reveal the lost information.  There is a chemical method which is sometimes  successful in retrieving surface detail, but it is rarely used by  conservators.  This is because it  permanently alters the chemical composition of a lead object and prevents  future chemical analysis.  In the case of  these seals, it was determined that chemical intervention was appropriate as  the information obtained from the surface decoration was more valuable than the  material composition of the lead from which the objects are made.  Fortunately, it was possible to recover the  images visible on these two lead seals and with further research add to the  archaeologists’ knowledge of the Angelica Knoll site.
 
| References | 
|  | 
| Adams, Diane L. | 
| 1989 | Lead Seals for Fort Michilimackinac, 1715-1781. Archaeological Completion Report Series #14., Mackinac State Historic Parks, Mackinac Island, MI. | 
|  | 
| Egan, Geoff | 
| 1994 | Lead Cloth Seals and Related Items in the British Museum. [with Mike Cowell and HeroGranger Taylor]. British Museum Occasional Paper #93., British Museum Press, London. | 
|  | 
| Endrei, W. and Egan, G. | 
| 1982 | The sealing of cloth in Europe, with special reference to the English evidence. Textile History13. | 
|  | 
| Luckenbach, Al and Cox, C. Jane | 
| 2003 | 17th century lead cloth seals from Anne Arundel County, Maryland. Maryland Archaeology, Vol. 39. | 
|  |